Old code, new life.

Almost always, yes. We've taken sites off jQuery, PHP monoliths, and even some legacy CMSes that nobody supports anymore. The honest answer comes after we look at it, sometimes a refresh is enough, sometimes a rebuild is faster than the duct tape. We'll tell you which.

Yes, we treat URL structure as load-bearing. We map every existing route to its new home and ship 301 redirects for anything that has to change. Sitemaps, structured data, canonical tags, meta, all preserved or improved. You shouldn't lose rankings; you should gain them.

Carefully. We script everything, run migrations against a copy first, validate counts and edge cases, then cut over with a rollback plan. For content-heavy sites, we'll preserve every author, post, image, and comment thread. Nothing gets left behind.

Piece-by-piece is usually how we recommend it. Strangler-fig pattern: stand up the new system alongside the old, route traffic incrementally, decommission the old when each piece is replaced. Lower risk, faster wins, and you can stop whenever you want.

Good, those are the parts to keep. We don't believe in rebuilding for the sake of rebuilding. We'll integrate with what's working (admin panels, internal APIs, content workflows) and only modernize what's actively holding you back.

Depends entirely on what we're modernizing and how. A focused design refresh can be weeks. A full stack rebuild on a complex product is longer. We'll scope it on the call with no padded timelines, no "6-month phase one."